Damage to property and infrastructure is a significant concern for communities, governments, and individuals around the world. The causes of such damage are varied, often depending on geographic location, socio-economic factors, and environmental conditions. Understanding these common causes is crucial for developing strategies to mitigate potential damages and protect human life and economic assets.
One of the most prominent causes of damage to property and infrastructure is natural disasters. This category includes hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, and wildfires, each capable of inflicting severe harm on built and natural environments. For instance, earthquakes can lead to catastrophic collapses of buildings and bridges due to violent shaking. Similarly, hurricanes and floods can cause extensive water damage and undermine structural foundations. Wildfires pose a particular threat in dry regions, capable of annihilating homes, businesses, and critical infrastructure like power lines and roads within hours.
Another significant threat comes from human activities, particularly urban development without adequate planning or disregard for building codes and regulations. In densely populated cities where high-rise buildings are common, the failure to adhere to engineering standards can lead to disasters during events like earthquakes or strong winds. Poorly planned urban areas might also suffer from inadequate drainage systems that exacerbate flooding during heavy rains.
Aging infrastructure is also a critical issue facing many parts of the world. Roads, bridges, water supply systems, dams, and other infrastructural elements deteriorate over time if not properly maintained. This degradation can increase the risk of failures that not only cause immediate harm but also have long-term economic impacts due to interruptions in transportation networks and utilities services.
Technological failures additionally pose risks to modern infrastructure systems. As societies become increasingly dependent on technology for operation-from traffic control systems to power grids-a single glitch or cyberattack could trigger widespread disruptions. For example, a successful hack into a city's electrical grid could result in widespread power outages affecting everything from individual homes to major transportation systems.
Lastly, climate change continues to modify risk landscapes by increasing the frequency and intensity of certain types of natural disasters such as storms and flooding events. Rising sea levels threaten coastal infrastructures with more regular inundation events while changing weather patterns can lead to unusual temperature fluctuations that stress energy supplies meant for heating or cooling.
To combat these threats effectively requires a multifaceted approach involving robust construction practices compliant with modern safety standards; ongoing maintenance programs; investment in new technologies for better risk assessment; stronger cybersecurity measures; community planning adapted for future climatic uncertainties; governmental legislation focused on safety regulations; international collaboration in disaster response techniques; public awareness campaigns about risks associated with neglecting proper building practices or ignoring evacuation orders during extreme events.
In conclusion, protecting property and infrastructure from damage is an ongoing challenge requiring constant vigilance regarding both natural phenomena as well as human-induced factors. Through education about these risks combined with strategic planning at multiple governance levels-individuals through international bodies-the resilience of societies worldwide will be strengthened against foreseeable dangers.
The economic impact of damage to property or infrastructure on both local and national economies can be profound and multifaceted, influencing a wide range of sectors, from small businesses to national supply chains. This essay explores the various ways in which such damages can affect economies, drawing upon examples and theoretical insights.
To begin with, at the local level, the immediate effect of damage to property or infrastructure is often a direct loss of economic activity. For instance, if a natural disaster like a hurricane or an earthquake damages commercial buildings and homes in a town, businesses have to close temporarily. This leads not only to lost revenue for business owners but also causes disruptions in livelihood for employees who may lose their jobs or face reduced hours of work. Small businesses, which typically have fewer resources to recover from such setbacks compared to larger corporations, may struggle significantly or even fail, leading to further economic decline within the community.
Moreover, infrastructure is the backbone of any economy. Damage to critical infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and utilities can lead to severe disruptions. For example, if a major highway used for transporting goods is damaged, it directly affects logistics and supply chains. Businesses will face delays in shipments that can ripple through the economy causing inventory shortages. In agricultural areas, damaged infrastructure can prevent farmers from getting their produce to markets timely which might lead not only to financial losses for farmers but also contribute to scarcity of products in markets.
At a broader national level, significant damage to localities can cumulatively harm the country's GDP. Recovery and reconstruction efforts are costly and typically require diversion of government resources from other planned expenditures or could lead into increased national debt if additional funds are borrowed. While reconstruction does contribute positively toward GDP figures due mainly as an accounting measure reflecting increased construction activity and employment generation in recovery efforts; this is essentially rebuilding what has been lost rather than creating new wealth or assets.
Furthermore, international perception of stability within a country affected by frequent infrastructural damages might deter foreign investment - essential for many developing nations relying on foreign capital for growth projects. Investors generally seek stability and predictability when committing their resources which becomes questionable in regions prone to recurrent damages.
However complex these impacts might appear initially; there are strategies that can mitigate adverse effects over time including enhanced planning regulations that ensure buildings are more resistant against potential disasters; improved early warning systems and effective disaster preparedness strategies; robust insurance markets that spread financial risks associated with property and infrastructural damage; along with investments into modernizing infrastructure so it remains resilient against future threats.
In conclusion, while damage to property or infrastructure poses significant threats at multiple levels of an economy - local through national - understanding these impacts provides valuable insights into appropriate mitigation strategies that enhance resilience against future incidents thereby protecting societal welfare over long term.
The psychological effects on communities affected by infrastructure damage go far beyond the immediate disruptions of daily life. When roads, bridges, utilities, or buildings are impaired or destroyed due to events like natural disasters, terrorist attacks, or simple neglect, the impact resonates deeply within the community's collective psyche. This essay explores how damaged infrastructure can threaten not only physical safety but also emotional and social stability.
Firstly, consider the immediate aftermath of infrastructure damage. The disruption to essential services such as water supply, electricity, and transportation creates a direct survival challenge. Residents may struggle to access clean water, food supplies might dwindle as transport routes are compromised, and lack of heating or cooling systems can make extreme weather conditions unbearable. These challenges aren't just inconveniences; they pose serious health risks and create a state of chronic stress among the affected populations.
This ongoing stress is compounded by uncertainty and loss of predictability in daily life. Humans rely on routines for psychological comfort and security. When infrastructure fails, so does the routine structure it supports. Children may be unable to attend school; adults might find it difficult to reach their workplaces. This disruption not only affects economic stability but also erodes the sense of normalcy that is crucial for mental health.
Moreover, damaged infrastructure often leads to a breakdown in social cohesion which can exacerbate feelings of isolation or alienation among community members. Infrastructure is not merely physical; it supports social structures through places like schools, churches, parks, and community centers where people gather to connect and support each other. When these are inaccessible or destroyed, opportunities for necessary social interaction diminish alongside trust in societal systems and leadership.
Long-term stress related to infrastructure damage can lead to significant mental health crises including anxiety disorders, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The visuals of collapsed buildings or unusable roads serve as constant reminders of trauma experienced during the event that caused the destruction-be it a hurricane's fury or an earthquake's tremor-retriggering distress every time they are encountered.
Economically disadvantaged areas often face harsher impacts because they might already suffer from poorly maintained infrastructure and limited resources for quick recovery. Inequality in these dimensions can deepen existing societal fractures creating further psychological strain on these vulnerable populations who feel neglected by broader recovery efforts.
Community resilience plays a vital role in mitigating these psychological impacts. Effective leadership that ensures swift action towards recovery and rehabilitation helps rebuild trust in institutions while providing hope-a critical element for psychological recovery-to those affected. Initiatives that engage community members in rebuilding efforts empower them by giving them control over their recovery environment which significantly aids psychological healing.
In conclusion, while the primary focus following infrastructure damage is often on physical reconstruction-rehanging power lines or patching up roadways-the intangible needs such as addressing community morale and mental health are equally vital. Bridging this gap requires comprehensive planning that considers both structural repair and psychosocial rehabilitation strategies tailored to help communities bounce back stronger both physically and mentally from the traumas endured due to damaged infrastructures.
When considering the risks associated with property damage, particularly in the context of threats to infrastructure, it is crucial to implement robust strategies for mitigation. Property and infrastructure are fundamental to the functioning of society, serving as the backbone for economic activity, public safety, and community well-being. Therefore, managing these risks requires a comprehensive approach that encompasses planning, preparation, and adaptation.
Risk Assessment and Planning
The first step in mitigating risks related to property damage is thorough risk assessment and planning. This involves identifying potential threats that could cause damage such as natural disasters (e.g., hurricanes, earthquakes), human activities (e.g., industrial accidents), or technological failures (e.g., power outages). Understanding the likelihood and potential impact of these threats helps in prioritizing which risks need more immediate attention.
Once identified, developing a strategic plan that addresses these risks is essential. This plan should include both preventive measures to reduce risk and responsive strategies to manage any incidents that occur. For example, building codes can be enforced or updated to ensure structures are resistant to specific types of hazards like floods or seismic activities.
Investing in Infrastructure Resilience
A key component of mitigating property damage is investing in resilient infrastructure. This means designing buildings and other structures with enhanced materials and technologies that can withstand adverse conditions without significant damage. Retrofitting older structures to meet current safety standards is also part of this strategy.
Furthermore, resilience can be bolstered by incorporating redundancy into critical systems such as power supplies and water services. This ensures that if one system fails during a disaster, another can take over without major disruption.
Community Awareness and Preparedness Programs
Educating the public about the risks associated with property damage and how to effectively respond is another vital strategy. Community preparedness programs can equip citizens with the knowledge and tools they need to protect their properties during emergencies. These programs often include training on basic emergency response actions like evacuation procedures or how to use sandbags during flooding.
Local governments can also encourage participation in regular drills for various scenarios so that community members become familiar with emergency protocols. This not only reduces panic during actual events but also improves overall response efficiency by ensuring everyone knows their role.
Adoption of Technology
Technological advancements have enabled more sophisticated methods for monitoring threats and managing responses. For example, sensor networks can be installed across cities to provide real-time data on environmental changes or structural stresses within buildings. Such technologies enable proactive management of emerging situations before they escalate into serious property damage.
Furthermore, using geographic information systems (GIS) for mapping risk areas allows planners to visualize where vulnerabilities lie within a landscape or urban area—informing more targeted interventions.
Insurance as a Risk Transfer Mechanism
Finally, insurance remains one of the most straightforward ways for individuals and businesses alike to mitigate financial losses due from property damage. Adequate insurance coverage ensures that resources will be available for recovery without devastating economic impacts on those affected by an incident.
In conclusion, while it's impossible to eliminate all risks associated with property damage entirely—particularly in light of changing global climate patterns—the above strategies provide substantial ways for communities globally towards minimizing potential damages efficiently when faced with various threats; thereby enhancing overall societal resilience against unforeseen calamities.
Technological Advances in Protecting Infrastructure Against Damage Threats
In the modern world, where the fabric of society is intricately intertwined with its physical and digital infrastructures, protecting these assets against various threats has become paramount. The escalation of natural disasters due to climate change, coupled with increased cybersecurity risks and terrorism, has pushed technology to evolve rapidly in the field of infrastructure protection. This essay delves into some of the cutting-edge technological advancements that are being employed to safeguard infrastructure from potential damage.
One of the foremost areas where technology is making significant strides is in enhancing structural resilience against natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, and hurricanes. Smart materials and construction technologies are at the forefront of this endeavor. For example, shape memory alloys and self-healing concrete are increasingly being integrated into building designs. These materials can absorb substantial stresses during seismic activities or extreme weather events and return to their original state, thereby reducing structural damage significantly.
Moreover, the use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) has transformed how structures are planned and constructed. BIM facilitates a more interactive approach to design and construction processes, enabling engineers and architects to simulate disaster impacts on virtual models of buildings before actual construction commences. This preemptive analysis helps in enhancing the designs to withstand specific threats.
On another front, sensor technologies have revolutionized infrastructure monitoring by allowing for real-time data collection about structural health. Sensors embedded within critical infrastructure can detect early signs of deterioration or stress long before they become apparent visually or cause functional disruptions. For instance, fiber optic sensors within bridges or dams monitor strain and temperature changes that could indicate potential issues like cracks or overloads.
The realm of cybersecurity also plays a crucial role in protecting infrastructural integrity in our increasingly connected world. Cyberattacks targeting operational technology systems can lead to severe consequences not just digitally but physically as well-shutting down power grids or contaminating water supplies are stark examples. Advanced cybersecurity measures including intrusion detection systems, robust firewalls, and machine learning algorithms for anomaly detection are essential tools used by entities managing critical infrastructure.
Furthermore, drone technology aids immensely in surveillance and maintenance operations for large-scale infrastructure projects such as pipelines, electrical lines, and railroad tracks. Drones equipped with high-resolution cameras and thermal imaging can conduct regular inspections over vast areas more efficiently than human teams on ground level could achieve; identifying vulnerabilities faster promotes timely interventions that prevent minor damages from escalating into catastrophic failures.
Lastly, artificial intelligence (AI) continues to be an invaluable asset across multiple facets of infrastructure protection-ranging from predictive maintenance using AI algorithms that analyze historical data trends to identify likely failure points ahead of time; through real-time decision-making support during disaster management scenarios where AI systems provide insights derived from multiple data streams quicker than human analysts ever could.
In conclusion, while challenges remain substantial in terms of ensuring absolute security for our physical and digital infrastructures against all manner of threats; technological advancements continue to offer promising solutions that enhance resiliency at every possible point-from prevention through response stages. As these technologies evolve further and integrate more seamlessly together-together with strategic policy decisions-we stand better equipped than ever before in safeguarding our vital infrastructural assets against inevitable adversities.
The impact of disasters on property and infrastructure poses significant threats, often resulting in long-term socio-economic disruptions. Effective disaster response and recovery are crucial for mitigating these impacts, restoring normalcy, and enhancing resilience. This essay explores several case studies that exemplify effective strategies in responding to and recovering from such calamities.
One notable example is the response to the 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan. The disaster devastated vast areas, including critical infrastructure such as the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. In response, Japan implemented a multi-faceted strategy focusing on immediate humanitarian aid followed by rapid infrastructure repair and reconstruction. The government also revised building codes and introduced stricter construction regulations to enhance structural resilience against future seismic events. This proactive approach not only facilitated swift recovery but also improved overall disaster preparedness.
Another exemplary case is the recovery efforts following Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, USA, in 2005. Despite initial criticisms of the response efforts, substantial progress was made in rebuilding the city’s infrastructure over the years that followed. Innovations included the redesigning of the levee system that had catastrophically failed during the hurricane. Federal and local authorities worked together with engineers and urban planners to construct a more robust flood defense system designed to withstand similar or worse conditions in future. These measures have not just rebuilt what was lost but transformed New Orleans into a stronger, more resilient city against future floods.
In Europe, after severe flooding affected Central Europe during 2013, countries like Germany excelled in rapid response and efficient resource mobilization which minimized long-term negative outcomes. The German government invested heavily in reconstructing affected areas while also upgrading its weather forecasting systems and improving communication mechanisms between different levels of government and public warning services. These advancements have significantly reduced vulnerability to recurring flooding events.
The Christchurch earthquakes of 2010-2011 in New Zealand offer insights into an effective urban recovery process following major earthquakes. Post-disaster efforts were characterized by strong leadership, community involvement, and transparent decision-making processes which facilitated both physical reconstruction and psychological recovery for its residents. The city’s focus on "build back better" has led to more resilient urban planning that considers not only earthquake resistance but also community needs such as green spaces, public transport options, and disability access.
These cases underscore several key elements essential for effective disaster response: rapid action coordinated by competent leadership; engagement with local communities; investment in rebuilding better rather than just restoration; ongoing revision of policies based on lessons learned; integration of technological advances; and comprehensive planning considering both immediate recovery needs and future risk reduction.
Therefore, it is evident from these examples that addressing property or infrastructure damage effectively requires a multifaceted approach involving immediate relief actions coupled with strategic long-term planning aimed at bolstering resilience against potential future threats. By focusing on innovative solutions tailored to specific environmental risks faced by each region or community involved, governments can significantly improve their disaster preparedness levels while efficiently managing recovery processes.
Arboriculture (/ˈɑËÂrbÉ™rɪˌkÊŒltʃər, É‘ËÂrˈbÉâ€Ã‹Âr-/)[1] is the cultivation, management, and study of individual trees, shrubs, vines, and other perennial woody plants. The science of arboriculture studies how these plants grow and respond to cultural practices and to their environment. The practice of arboriculture includes cultural techniques such as selection, planting, training, fertilization, pest and pathogen control, pruning, shaping, and removal.
A person who practices or studies arboriculture can be termed an arborist or an arboriculturist. A tree surgeon is more typically someone who is trained in the physical maintenance and manipulation of trees and therefore more a part of the arboriculture process rather than an arborist. Risk management, legal issues, and aesthetic considerations have come to play prominent roles in the practice of arboriculture. Businesses often need to hire arboriculturists to complete "tree hazard surveys" and generally manage the trees on-site to fulfill occupational safety and health obligations.[citation needed]
Arboriculture is primarily focused on individual woody plants and trees maintained for permanent landscape and amenity purposes, usually in gardens, parks or other populated settings, by arborists, for the enjoyment, protection, and benefit of people.[citation needed]
Arboricultural matters are also considered to be within the practice of urban forestry yet the clear and separate divisions are not distinct or discreet.[citation needed]
Tree benefits are the economic, ecological, social and aesthetic use, function purpose, or services of a tree (or group of trees), in its situational context in the landscape.
A tree defect is any feature, condition, or deformity of a tree that indicates weak structure or instability that could contribute to tree failure.
Common types of tree defects:
Codominant stems: two or more stems that grow upward from a single point of origin and compete with one another.
Included bark: bark is incorporated in the joint between two limbs, creating a weak attachment
Dead, diseased, or broken branches:
Cracks
Cavity and hollows: sunken or open areas wherein a tree has suffered injury followed by decay. Further indications include: fungal fruiting structures, insect or animal nests.
Lean: a lean of more than 40% from vertical presents a risk of tree failure
Taper: change in diameter over the length of trunks branches and roots
Epicormic branches (water sprouts in canopy or suckers from root system): often grow in response to major damage or excessive pruning
Roots:
Proper tree installation ensures the long-term viability of the tree and reduces the risk of tree failure.
Quality nursery stock must be used. There must be no visible damage or sign of disease. Ideally the tree should have good crown structure. A healthy root ball should not have circling roots and new fibrous roots should be present at the soil perimeter. Girdling or circling roots should be pruned out. Excess soil above the root flare should be removed immediately, since it present a risk of disease ingress into the trunk.
Appropriate time of year to plant: generally fall or early spring in temperate regions of the northern hemisphere.
Planting hole: the planting hole should be 3 times the width of the root ball. The hole should be dug deep enough that when the root ball is placed on the substrate, the root flare is 3–5cm above the surrounding soil grade. If soil is left against the trunk, it may lead to bark, cambium and wood decay. Angular sides to the planting hole will encourage roots to grow radially from the trunk, rather than circling the planting hole. In urban settings, soil preparation may include the use of:
Tree wells: a zone of mulch can be installed around the tree trunk to: limit root zone competition (from turf or weeds), reduce soil compaction, improve soil structure, conserve moisture, and keep lawn equipment at a distance. No more than 5–10cm of mulch should be used to avoid suffocating the roots. Mulch must be kept approximately 20cm from the trunk to avoid burying the root flare. With city trees additional tree well preparation includes:
Tree grates/grill and frames: limit compaction on root zone and mechanical damage to roots and trunk
Root barriers: forces roots to grow down under surface asphalt/concrete/pavers to limit infrastructure damage from roots
Staking: newly planted, immature trees should be staked for one growing season to allow for the root system to establish. Staking for longer than one season should only be considered in situations where the root system has failed to establish sufficient structural support. Guy wires can be used for larger, newly planted trees. Care must be used to avoid stem girdling from the support system ties.
Irrigation: irrigation infrastructure may be installed to ensure a regular water supply throughout the lifetime of the tree. Wicking beds are an underground reservoir from which water is wicked into soil. Watering bags may be temporarily installed around tree stakes to provide water until the root system becomes established. Permeable paving allows for water infiltration in paved urban settings, such as parks and walkways.
Within the United Kingdom trees are considered as a material consideration within the town planning system and may be conserved as amenity landscape[2] features.
The role of the Arborist or Local Government Arboricultural Officer is likely to have a great effect on such matters. Identification of trees of high quality which may have extensive longevity is a key element in the preservation of trees.
Urban and rural trees may benefit from statutory protection under the Town and Country Planning[3] system. Such protection can result in the conservation and improvement of the urban forest as well as rural settlements.
Historically the profession divides into the operational and professional areas. These might be further subdivided into the private and public sectors. The profession is broadly considered as having one trade body known as the Arboricultural Association, although the Institute of Chartered Foresters offers a route for professional recognition and chartered arboriculturist status.
The qualifications associated with the industry range from vocational to Doctorate. Arboriculture is a comparatively young industry.
An arborist, or (less commonly) arboriculturist, is a professional in the practice of arboriculture, which is the cultivation, management, and study of individual trees, shrubs, vines, and other perennial woody plants in dendrology and horticulture.[citation needed]
Arborists generally focus on the health and safety of individual plants and trees, rather than managing forests or harvesting wood (silviculture or forestry). An arborist's scope of work is therefore distinct from that of either a forester or a logger.[citation needed]
In order for arborists to work near power wires, either additional training is required or they need to be certified as a Qualified Line Clearance Arborist or Utility Arborist (there may be different terminology for various countries). There is a variety of minimum distances that must be kept from power wires depending on voltage, however the common distance for low voltage lines in urban settings is 10 feet (about 3 metres).[1]
Arborists who climb (as not all do) can use a variety of techniques to ascend into the tree. The least invasive, and most popular technique used is to ascend on rope. There are two common methods of climbing, Single Rope System (SRS) and Moving Rope System (MRS). When personal safety is an issue, or the tree is being removed, arborists may use 'spikes', (also known as 'gaffs' or 'spurs') attached to their chainsaw boots with straps to ascend and work. Spikes wound the tree, leaving small holes where each step has been.[citation needed]
An arborist's work may involve very large and complex trees, or ecological communities and their abiotic components in the context of the landscape ecosystem. These may require monitoring and treatment to ensure they are healthy, safe, and suitable to property owners or community standards. This work may include some or all of the following: planting; transplanting; pruning; structural support; preventing, or diagnosing and treating phytopathology or parasitism; preventing or interrupting grazing or predation; installing lightning protection; and removing vegetation deemed as hazardous, an invasive species, a disease vector, or a weed.[citation needed]
Arborists may also plan, consult, write reports and give legal testimony. While some aspects of this work are done on the ground or in an office, much of it is done by arborists who perform tree services and who climb the trees with ropes, harnesses and other equipment. Lifts and cranes may be used too. The work of all arborists is not the same. Some may just provide a consulting service; others may perform climbing, pruning and planting: whilst others may provide a combination of all of these services.[2]
Arborists gain qualifications to practice arboriculture in a variety of ways and some arborists are more qualified than others. Experience working safely and effectively in and around trees is essential. Arborists tend to specialize in one or more disciplines of arboriculture, such as diagnosis and treatment of pests, diseases and nutritional deficiencies in trees, climbing and pruning, cabling and lightning protection, or consultation and report writing. All these disciplines are related to one another and some arborists are very well experienced in all areas of tree work, however not all arborists have the training or experience to properly practice every discipline.[citation needed]
Arborists choose to pursue formal certification, which is available in some countries and varies somewhat by location. An arborist who holds certification in one or more disciplines may be expected to participate in rigorous continuing education requirements to ensure constant improvement of skills and techniques.[citation needed]
In Australia, arboricultural education and training are streamlined countrywide through a multi-disciplinary vocational education, training, and qualification authority called the Australian Qualifications Framework, which offers varying levels of professional qualification. Government institutions including Technical and Further Education TAFE offer Certificate III or a diploma in arboriculture as well as some universities.[3][4] There are also many private institutions covering similar educational framework in each state. Recognition of prior learning is also an option for practicing arborists with 10 or more years of experience with no prior formal training. It allows them to be assessed and fast track their certification.[citation needed]
In France, a qualified arborist must hold a Management of Ornamental Trees certificate, and a qualified arborist climber must hold a Pruning and Care of Trees certificate; both delivered by the French Ministry of Agriculture.[5][6]
In the UK, an arborist can gain qualifications up to and including a master's degree. College-based courses include further education qualifications, such as national certificate, national diploma, while higher education courses in arboriculture include foundation degree, bachelor's degree and master's degree.[citation needed]
In the US, a Certified Arborist (CA) is a professional who has over three years of documented and verified experience and has passed a rigorous written test from the International Society of Arboriculture. Other designations include Municipal Specialist, Utility Specialist and Board Certified Master Arborist (BCMA). The USA and Canada additionally have college-based training which, if passed, will give the certificate of Qualified Arborist. The Qualified Arborist can then be used to offset partial experience towards the Certified Arborist.
Tree Risk Assessment Qualified credential (TRAQ), designed by the International Society of Arboriculture, was launched in 2013. At that time people holding the TRACE credential were transferred over to the TRAQ credential.[citation needed]
In Canada, there are provincially governed apprenticeship programs that allow arborists' to work near power lines upon completion. These apprenticeship programs must meet the provincial reregulations (For example, in B.C. they must meet WorkSafeBC G19.30), and individuals must ensure they meet the requirements of the owner of the power system.[citation needed]
Trees in urban landscape settings are often subject to disturbances, whether human or natural, both above and below ground. They may require care to improve their chances of survival following damage from either biotic or abiotic causes. Arborists can provide appropriate solutions, such as pruning trees for health and good structure, for aesthetic reasons, and to permit people to walk under them (a technique often referred to as "crown raising"), or to keep them away from wires, fences and buildings (a technique referred to as "crown reduction").[7] Timing and methods of treatment depend on the species of tree and the purpose of the work. To determine the best practices, a thorough knowledge of local species and environments is essential.[citation needed]
There can be a vast difference between the techniques and practices of professional arborists and those of inadequately trained tree workers. Some commonly offered "services" are considered unacceptable by modern arboricultural standards and may seriously damage, disfigure, weaken, or even kill trees. One such example is tree topping, lopping, or "hat-racking", where entire tops of trees or main stems are removed, generally by cross-cutting the main stem(s) or leaders, leaving large unsightly stubs. Trees that manage to survive such treatment are left prone to a spectrum of detrimental effects, including vigorous but weakly attached regrowth, pest susceptibility, pathogen intrusion, and internal decay.[8]
Pruning should only be done with a specific purpose in mind. Every cut is a wound, and every leaf lost is removal of photosynthetic potential. Proper pruning can be helpful in many ways, but should always be done with the minimum amount of live tissue removed.[9]
In recent years, research has proven that wound dressings such as paint, tar or other coverings are unnecessary and may harm trees. The coverings may encourage growth of decay-causing fungi. Proper pruning, by cutting through branches at the right location, can do more to limit decay than wound dressing [10]
Chemicals can be applied to trees for insect or disease control through soil application, stem injections or spraying. Compacted or disturbed soils can be improved in various ways.[citation needed]
Arborists can also assess trees to determine the health, structure, safety or feasibility within a landscape and in proximity to humans. Modern arboriculture has progressed in technology and sophistication from practices of the past. Many current practices are based on knowledge gained through recent research, including that of Alex Shigo, considered one "father" of modern arboriculture.[11]
Depending on the jurisdiction, there may be a number of legal issues surrounding the practices of arborists, including boundary issues, public safety issues, "heritage" trees of community value, and "neighbour" issues such as ownership, obstruction of views, impacts of roots crossing boundaries, nuisance problems, disease or insect quarantines, and safety of nearby trees or plants that may be affected.[citation needed]
Arborists are frequently consulted to establish the factual basis of disputes involving trees, or by private property owners seeking to avoid legal liability through the duty of care.[12] Arborists may be asked to assess the value of a tree[13] in the process of an insurance claim for trees damaged or destroyed,[14] or to recover damages resulting from tree theft or vandalism.[15] In cities with tree preservation orders an arborist's evaluation of tree hazard may be required before a property owner may remove a tree, or to assure the protection of trees in development plans and during construction operations. Carrying out work on protected trees and hedges is illegal without express permission from local authorities,[16] and can result in legal action including fines.[17] Homeowners who have entered into contracts with a Homeowner's association (see also Restrictive covenants) may need an arborists' professional opinion of a hazardous condition prior to removing a tree, or may be obligated to assure the protection of the views of neighboring properties prior to planting a tree or in the course of pruning.[18] Arborists may be consulted in forensic investigations where the evidence of a crime can be determined within the growth rings of a tree, for example. Arborists may be engaged by one member of a dispute in order to identify factual information about trees useful to that member of the dispute, or they can be engaged as an expert witness providing unbiased scientific knowledge in a court case. Homeowners associations seeking to write restrictive covenants, or legislative bodies seeking to write laws involving trees, may seek the counsel of arborists in order to avoid future difficulties.[19]
Before undertaking works in the UK, arborists have a legal responsibility to survey trees for wildlife, especially bats, which are given particular legal protection. In addition, any tree in the UK can be covered by a tree preservation order and it is illegal to conduct any work on a tree, including deadwooding or pruning, before permission has been sought from the local council.[citation needed]
The protagonist in Italo Calvino's novel The Baron in the Trees lives life on the ground as a boy and spends the rest of his life swinging from tree to tree in the Italian countryside. As a young man he helps the local fruit farmers by pruning their trees.[citation needed]
Some noteworthy arborists include:
Forestry is the science and craft of creating, managing, planting, using, conserving and repairing forests and woodlands for associated resources for human and environmental benefits.[1] Forestry is practiced in plantations and natural stands.[2] The science of forestry has elements that belong to the biological, physical, social, political and managerial sciences.[3] Forest management plays an essential role in the creation and modification of habitats and affects ecosystem services provisioning.[4]
Modern forestry generally embraces a broad range of concerns, in what is known as multiple-use management, including: the provision of timber, fuel wood, wildlife habitat, natural water quality management, recreation, landscape and community protection, employment, aesthetically appealing landscapes, biodiversity management, watershed management, erosion control, and preserving forests as "sinks" for atmospheric carbon dioxide.
Forest ecosystems have come to be seen as the most important component of the biosphere,[5] and forestry has emerged as a vital applied science, craft, and technology. A practitioner of forestry is known as a forester. Another common term is silviculturist. Silviculture is narrower than forestry, being concerned only with forest plants, but is often used synonymously with forestry.
All people depend upon forests and their biodiversity, some more than others.[6] Forestry is an important economic segment in various industrial countries,[7] as forests provide more than 86 million green jobs and support the livelihoods of many more people.[6] For example, in Germany, forests cover nearly a third of the land area,[8] wood is the most important renewable resource, and forestry supports more than a million jobs and about €181 billion of value to the German economy each year.[9]
Worldwide, an estimated 880 million people spend part of their time collecting fuelwood or producing charcoal, many of them women.[6][quantify] Human populations tend to be low in areas of low-income countries with high forest cover and high forest biodiversity, but poverty rates in these areas tend to be high.[6] Some 252 million people living in forests and savannahs have incomes of less than US$1.25 per day.[6]
Over the past centuries, forestry was regarded as a separate science. With the rise of ecology and environmental science, there has been a reordering in the applied sciences. In line with this view, forestry is a primary land-use science comparable with agriculture.[10] Under these headings, the fundamentals behind the management of natural forests comes by way of natural ecology. Forests or tree plantations, those whose primary purpose is the extraction of forest products, are planned and managed to utilize a mix of ecological and agroecological principles.[11] In many regions of the world there is considerable conflict between forest practices and other societal priorities such as water quality, watershed preservation, sustainable fishing, conservation, and species preservation.[12]
Silvology (Latin: silva or sylva, "forests and woods"; Ancient Greek: -λογία, -logia, "science of" or "study of") is the biological science of studying forests and woodlands, incorporating the understanding of natural forest ecosystems, and the effects and development of silvicultural practices. The term complements silviculture, which deals with the art and practice of forest management.[13]
Silvology is seen as a single science for forestry and was first used by Professor Roelof A.A. Oldeman at Wageningen University.[14] It integrates the study of forests and forest ecology, dealing with single tree autecology and natural forest ecology.
Dendrology (Ancient Greek: δÃŽÂνδρον, dendron, "tree"; and Ancient Greek: -λογία, -logia, science of or study of) or xylology (Ancient Greek: ξÃÂλον, ksulon, "wood") is the science and study of woody plants (trees, shrubs, and lianas), specifically, their taxonomic classifications.[15] There is no sharp boundary between plant taxonomy and dendrology; woody plants not only belong to many different plant families, but these families may be made up of both woody and non-woody members. Some families include only a few woody species. Dendrology, as a discipline of industrial forestry, tends to focus on identification of economically useful woody plants and their taxonomic interrelationships. As an academic course of study, dendrology will include all woody plants, native and non-native, that occur in a region. A related discipline is the study of sylvics, which focuses on the autecology of genera and species.
The provenance of forest reproductive material used to plant forests has a great influence on how the trees develop, hence why it is important to use forest reproductive material of good quality and of high genetic diversity.[16] More generally, all forest management practices, including in natural regeneration systems, may impact the genetic diversity of trees.
The term genetic diversity describes the differences in DNA sequence between individuals as distinct from variation caused by environmental influences. The unique genetic composition of an individual (its genotype) will determine its performance (its phenotype) at a particular site.[17]
Genetic diversity is needed to maintain the vitality of forests and to provide resilience to pests and diseases. Genetic diversity also ensures that forest trees can survive, adapt and evolve under changing environmental conditions. Furthermore, genetic diversity is the foundation of biological diversity at species and ecosystem levels. Forest genetic resources are therefore important to consider in forest management.[16]
Genetic diversity in forests is threatened by forest fires, pests and diseases, habitat fragmentation, poor silvicultural practices and inappropriate use of forest reproductive material.
About 98 million hectares of forest were affected by fire in 2015; this was mainly in the tropical domain, where fire burned about 4 percent of the total forest area in that year. More than two-thirds of the total forest area affected was in Africa and South America. Insects, diseases and severe weather events damaged about 40 million hectares of forests in 2015, mainly in the temperate and boreal domains.[18]
Furthermore, the marginal populations of many tree species are facing new threats due to the effects of climate change.[16]
Most countries in Europe have recommendations or guidelines for selecting species and provenances that can be used in a given site or zone.[17]
Forest management is a branch of forestry concerned with overall administrative, legal, economic, and social aspects, as well as scientific and technical aspects, such as silviculture, forest protection, and forest regulation. This includes management for timber, aesthetics, recreation, urban values, water, wildlife, inland and nearshore fisheries, wood products, plant genetic resources, and other forest resource values.[19] Management objectives can be for conservation, utilisation, or a mixture of the two. Techniques include timber extraction, planting and replanting of different species, building and maintenance of roads and pathways through forests, and preventing fire.
The first dedicated forestry school was established by Georg Ludwig Hartig at Hungen in the Wetterau, Hesse, in 1787, though forestry had been taught earlier in central Europe, including at the University of Giessen, in Hesse-Darmstadt.
In Spain, the first forestry school was the Forest Engineering School of Madrid (Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Montes), founded in 1844.
The first in North America, the Biltmore Forest School was established near Asheville, North Carolina, by Carl A. Schenck on September 1, 1898, on the grounds of George W. Vanderbilt's Biltmore Estate. Another early school was the New York State College of Forestry, established at Cornell University just a few weeks later, in September 1898.
Early 19th century North American foresters went to Germany to study forestry. Some early German foresters also emigrated to North America.
In South America the first forestry school was established in Brazil, in Viçosa, Minas Gerais, in 1962, and moved the next year to become a faculty at the Federal University of Paraná, in Curitiba.[34]
Today, forestry education typically includes training in general biology, ecology, botany, genetics, soil science, climatology, hydrology, economics and forest management. Education in the basics of sociology and political science is often considered an advantage. Professional skills in conflict resolution and communication are also important in training programs.[35]
In India, forestry education is imparted in the agricultural universities and in Forest Research Institutes (deemed universities). Four year degree programmes are conducted in these universities at the undergraduate level. Masters and Doctorate degrees are also available in these universities.
In the United States, postsecondary forestry education leading to a Bachelor's degree or Master's degree is accredited by the Society of American Foresters.[36]
In Canada the Canadian Institute of Forestry awards silver rings to graduates from accredited university BSc programs, as well as college and technical programs.[37]
In many European countries, training in forestry is made in accordance with requirements of the Bologna Process and the European Higher Education Area.
The International Union of Forest Research Organizations is the only international organization that coordinates forest science efforts worldwide.[38]
In order to keep up with changing demands and environmental factors, forestry education does not stop at graduation. Increasingly, forestry professionals engage in regular training to maintain and improve on their management practices. An increasingly popular tool are marteloscopes; one hectare large, rectangular forest sites where all trees are numbered, mapped and recorded.
These sites can be used to do virtual thinnings and test one's wood quality and volume estimations as well as tree microhabitats. This system is mainly suitable to regions with small-scale multi-functional forest management systems
Forestry literature is the books, journals and other publications about forestry.
The first major works about forestry in the English language included Roger Taverner's Booke of Survey (1565), John Manwood's A Brefe Collection of the Lawes of the Forrest (1592) and John Evelyn's Sylva (1662).[39]
cite book
cite journal
The Society of American Foresters grants accreditation only to specific educational curricula that lead to a first professional degree in forestry at the bachelor's or master's level.
This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 (license statement/permission). Text taken from Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020 Key findings​, FAO, FAO.
This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (license statement/permission). Text taken from The State of the World's Forests 2020. Forests, biodiversity and people – In brief​, FAO & UNEP, FAO & UNEP.
This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under CC BY-SA IGO 3.0 (license statement/permission). Text taken from World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2023​, FAO, FAO.
We recently had five large pine trees taken down in our front yard. We had three bids from different tree companies. We also wanted the stumps ground as well as chasing roots above ground. Rudy was fantastic and his workers were very skilled and the clean up was exceptional. We would highly recommend them and not hesitate to use them again.
Used Rudy and All In Tree for numerous things over the last year and a half. Pricing is Competitive. Very responsive to calls and tests. I like that they're insured. Did what he said what he was going to do and when he said he was going to do it. A couple of things didn't meet my expectations and he immediately came out and made it right. I have recommended to multiple other people.
Update! 10/10/23 After they helped me last month, All in Tree Service has again saved the day! A couple of large trees washed down the creek on my property recently and one of them was lodged against the pipes that go from my house to the street. There were other large tree trunks in the creek as well and also one wedged against the supports for my bridge. The All In team went to work and within a couple of hours had everything cleaned up and removed. The pipes and the bridge are safe! I recommend this team wholeheartedly. They care about what they do and it shows. Thank you! I’m very grateful. This team exemplifies professionalism. The before and after pictures tell a great story. September 2023 I recently was fortunate enough to find Rudy and Yaremi of All In Tree Services. A very large and very high limb on a big oak tree was hanging after a storm. It was a danger to me, to my dogs and to the fence below it. I had never met Rudy and Yaremi before. They were the first to call me back when I started my search for a reliable tree service. They clearly wanted the business so I gave them a chance. I’m so glad I did. They were very impressive! Their strategy and teamwork were incredible. Clearly they are very experienced at this kind of work. I took some pictures but I wish I had filmed the whole thing. It was amazing. They roped off the limb so it would not fall on anything or anyone. Then they quickly got the limb cut and safely on the ground and helped to clear up the debris. I am extremely happy with their service and with the friendly and professional manner with which they conducted themselves. I have already recommended them to my neighbors and I strongly encourage anyone who needs tree services to call them.
All professional service. Timely, efficient, friendly. I had big old dead trees that I feared daily were going to come down. I called them in an emergency and they came the very next morning, no problem, no excuses. The guys were about service and me as a customer. They saw what I needed and went above and beyond to make sure I was a satisfied customer. I am a satisfied customer. I will use this company again and again. Thank you Rudy.